Healthcare
HIPAA-compliant EHR integrations, telemedicine platforms, patient scheduling systems.
How we work in healthcare
RNDSOL is a healthcare software development company building HIPAA-aligned EHR integrations, telemedicine platforms, and patient scheduling systems for clinics and hospital networks. Our engagements start in the clinic, not in a requirements document, because healthcare software fails for predictable reasons: a portal that ignores how a triage nurse actually works, an integration that drops lab results at 2am, a telemedicine feature bolted on after the fact.
As a healthcare software development company working from Lahore, Pakistan, we've built patient scheduling systems, EHR integration layers, and a telemedicine platform now serving a clinic network across nine locations. Our teams write HL7 v2 interfaces and FHIR R4 APIs week in, week out, so your patient data moves between systems without manual re-entry or brittle CSV exports.
Privacy isn't a checkbox for us. Whether your obligations come from HIPAA in the US, UK GDPR, or Saudi Arabia's PDPL, we design audit trails, role-based access, and encryption at rest from the first sprint. That's cheaper than retrofitting compliance later, and it's the only way an auditor will take your platform seriously.
What we build
The problems that bring teams to us
These are the patterns we see most often in healthcare engagements, and how we handle them.
Interoperability that actually works
Hospitals run a mix of legacy HL7 v2 feeds and modern FHIR endpoints. We build translation layers that keep both sides talking, so a lab result posted in one system shows up in the clinician's view within seconds, not overnight.
Patient data privacy
PHI needs field-level encryption, access logging, and consent tracking. We map every data flow before writing code, then design the audit trail an inspector would want to see.
Clinician adoption
Doctors abandon software that adds clicks. We shadow clinical staff during discovery and cut workflows down to what a busy shift can absorb, which is why our telemedicine rollout hit 78% clinician adoption in its first quarter.
Uptime you can defend
A booking system that's down on Monday morning is a clinical problem, not an IT problem. We design for failover, run load tests against appointment-rush patterns, and keep recovery time objectives in writing.
Billing and claims that reconcile
Care ends in a claim, and claims fail on data quality. We build billing integrations that validate encounter data before it becomes an X12 837 claim, post 835 remittances back automatically, and surface denial patterns so your revenue team fixes causes instead of chasing one rejection at a time.
Documents, not just APIs
Referrals, discharge summaries, and care plans still travel as documents. We handle CDA and CCDA exchange alongside FHIR, so the clinical record stays complete even when the other side of the connection is a fax-era system with a document interface.
How a project runs
Clinical discovery first
We interview the people who'll live in the system every day: front desk, nursing staff, billing. The workflow map that comes out of those sessions drives the build, not the other way around.
FHIR-first data design
We model patient, encounter, and observation data on FHIR R4 resources from day one. When you later need to connect a lab, a pharmacy, or a national health exchange, the plumbing already fits.
Security reviews every sprint
Threat modelling isn't a phase at the end. Each two-week sprint includes a review of new endpoints, permissions, and data flows against your compliance baseline.
Phased rollout with real patients
We launch to one department or one clinic, measure, fix, then expand. It's slower on paper and faster in practice, because you never have to walk back a big-bang launch.
Built to the rules your sector runs on
Standards and regulations we design against in this industry. Your compliance team owns interpretation; our job is making the system enforce it.
Questions we hear from teams like yours
Almost certainly. We've built interfaces against HL7 v2 feeds, FHIR R4 APIs, and, where nothing else exists, database-level integrations with vendor approval. The first step is a short technical audit of what your EHR actually exposes, which we run in the first week of discovery.
The same way any offshore vendor serving US healthcare does: signed BAAs where applicable, access controls that limit who can see PHI, encrypted environments, and audit logging on every touch. Location doesn't change the standard, and our engineers work inside it daily.
A focused MVP with video consultations, scheduling, and e-prescriptions typically takes four to six months. The clinic network platform in our case study went from kickoff to first live consultation in 22 weeks, then expanded feature by feature.
Yes. Patient portals and mobile apps for appointment booking, results, and follow-ups are usually the second phase of our healthcare projects, once the clinical core is stable. Same data layer, different front end.
Yes, with the boundaries drawn early. Ambient documentation, patient-message triage, and no-show prediction sit comfortably in decision support. The moment a feature starts diagnosing or dosing, it can qualify as Software as a Medical Device under FDA rules, so we flag that line during scoping and keep outputs advisory unless you're ready to pursue the regulatory pathway.
It depends on integrations and compliance scope more than screen count. A scheduling system starts far lower than a full telemedicine platform. Try our cost calculator for a first estimate, then talk to us for a scoped proposal.
Talk to us about your healthcare project
A 30-minute call with an engineer, not a salesperson. We'll tell you what we'd build, what we wouldn't, and what it's likely to cost.